greenfield vs brownfield sap. What is the difference between Brownfield, Greenfield and Bluefield? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the migration approaches? Which target. greenfield vs brownfield sap

 
What is the difference between Brownfield, Greenfield and Bluefield? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the migration approaches? Which targetgreenfield vs brownfield sap  To get you enabled to fully understand how to size the database of

Brownfield Sizing: If you have an SAP system running that you want to extend with new functionality (Delta Sizing – mix between greenfield and brownfield sizing) and/or add. In contrast, a brownfield implementation of SAP S/4HANA always begins with the existing system – it’s just that some important elements are changed. For consultants and SAP experts from companies, it is therefore an indispensable reference catalog for the migration to SAP S/4HANA. It is also imperative to follow the testing scenarios carefully, from unit and integration testing to system performance testing. The movement needs some specialized tools (available from SAP and other tools vendors) to extract the current configuration– without the data– and move it over to S/4HANA, followed by selectively choose data to move forward with. S/4HANA移行シナリオにおける “Greenfield”、”Brownfield”とは. Selective Data Transition is an alternative to the New Implementation approach (also called greenfield) or System Conversion approach (also called brownfield). Der Greenfield-Ansatz - nah am SAP-Standard . The update to EHP 8 (SAP enhancement package 8 for SAP ERP 6. It doesn’t rock the boat and it’s easy enough to execute. These tools check the system and its code for. Brownfield projects are normally associated with urban areas. SAP Community Mon, 15 Jun. IFS for S/4 Fashion; IFS for S/4 Retail; IFS for CAR; SAP CAR add-on Solutions; SimpleRetail; S/4HANA. Support for SAP S/4HANA Brownfield Implementations – Make the green light, before its red! – Update June 2019. Hello Connections, One of my friend is actively looking for a job as devops engineer. As businesses continue to evolve, they must adopt new technologies and systems to stay competitive. This data is compiled into an individualised report. Alternatively, a greenfield investment involves buying a site on which you will need to construct a building. Greenfield approach - new implementation. The readiness check reports will be the starting point if you want to understand the effort required for your transition to SAP GTS, edition for SAP HANA. Brownfield. A brownfield deployment, in information technology, is the installation and configuration of new hardware or software that must coexist with legacy IT systems. With Brownfield, organizations can handpick the modules, processes, or business units they want to shift to SAP S/4HANA. As an enhanced brownfield offering, Brownfield+ enables you to move efficiently to SAP S/4HANA and all the benefits it brings—including greater business insights and agility—through an approach focused on your specific business needs and designed to streamline the transformation journey. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give you dozens of results with blogs, articles, videos and even people who have coined the term “bluefield”. In SAP Central Finance, postings including the necessary tax information are automatically generated by replicating the financial documents of the source systems. SAP Archiving Process Flow. It starts from best practices and designing the ERP-solution, by the vendor/inhouse team. 0), any idea where. One option is to use a priority weight for each criteria in order of importance. First I will recap shortly the brownfield and greenfield approach to motivate the need for. The change from "R" to "S" stands for the great leap in development that SAP has made with. For example, repowering steam power plants with new gas turbines. 200 employees at work. Every client is different, with landscapes. So back to the SAP S/4HANA move: Everyone in the SAP world is familiar with the terms greenfield and brownfield, maybe you know them as New Implementation and System Conversion. Difference between SAP S/4HANA Greenfield vs Brownfield Implementation and Key Considerations Table of Contents Introduction Overview of SAP. One of the features SAP delivered with S/4HANA to ease conversion from SAP ECC are the so called Compatibility Pack Scope items. As hundreds of new SAP S/4HANA systems go live every month, more and more customers are looking for guidance on how. Both options have vital differences, such as risk, cost, location, and property. When it comes to SAP S/4HANA implementations and migrations, plenty of terminologies is flying around. Eine Greenfield-Implementierung bietet die Möglichkeit, eine vollständig neue IT-Landschaft aufzubauen und die Vorteile von SAP S/4HANA vollständig zu nutzen. S. This is a. The key is for developers to understand. brownfield. When considering greenfield vs. In contrast to the brownfield approach, the greenfield approach is dependent on creating a clean, new concept. Find out more about the transition to SAP S/4HANA and how to avoid the lift and shift. g. This approach allows you to implement a true upgrade or conversion of your system. SAP Sports One enables club and association managers to manage information and data about their athletes in a structured way. Brownfield Implementation. The brownfield alternative is SAP’s recommendation for customers who want to migrate to S/4HANA but preserve the value of the time and effort invested in adapting SAP ECC to. "This is likely one of the most important and early decisions that will need to be made," said John Belden, project execution advisory services practice leader at Boston-based consultancy UpperEdge. An automated retrofit approach to your SAP S/4HANA migration significantly reduces the time, effort, and risk to ensure SAP changes are synchronized in parallel across the dual system landscapes. Como se mencionó anteriormente, las inversiones nuevas y de remodelación son dos tipos de inversión extranjera directa. Bluefield. Greenfield vs Brownfield. August 6, 2023 by saptutorials. Greenfield approach: Squeaky clean S/4HANA authorizations vs. Brownfield migration involves upgrading the hardware and software of an existing system. This is a brand-new system. Devise an implementation strategy that reduces migration roadblocks. Greenfield land (image on the bottom) is land that has never been used for such industrial purposes. An example could be the recent release of iOS 16. greenfield issue -- or a third option known as a hybrid migration. Continue Reading About greenfield deployment Greenfield vs. Brownfield 软件开发是指在现有或遗留软件系统存在的情况下开发和部署新的软件系统。. Greenfield vs. A Guide on S/4HANA Approaches. Vice President SAP Delivery Norb is an innovative and effective Senior Information Technology and Program Management Executive. ) can be a challenge. This is the fastest and technically easiest option to convert any SAP ECC 6. Public Cloud . Greenfield vs. The private cloud is operated by SAP and hosted by a hyperscaler such as Google Cloud or Amazon Web Services. A related use of greenfield/brownfield occurs in the name of a US law: the "Brownfields law", signed by George W Bush in 2002, which limits liability for cleanup of "brownfield" sites for new owners. Greenfield Vs Brownfield. Meanwhile, 3% of respondents. Accenture’s Smart ()field approach focuses on business needs first and gives organizations more options to combine the best of brownfield and greenfield. The term “greenfield sizing” is mostly used in the context of. 0 or ECC 6. Greenfield and brownfield are two unique software development concepts. People planning to switch to SAP S/4HANA often have the classic migration scenario in mind Greenfield versus Conversion? Greenfield restart vs. Yet a move to S/4HANA can seem overwhelming, as worries of ecosystem complexity force SAP customers to consider the greenfield vs. SAP greenfield vs. Both routes come with their own advantages and challenges. What is the difference between Brownfield, Greenfield and Bluefield? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the migration approaches? Which target. At Applexus, we believe this is an oversimplification of how you need to think through your SAP S/4HANA digital transformation journey. Greenfield vs Brownfield? Starting with a brand-new SAP S/4HANA system, using the greenfield approach may suit some organizations. 0 (or earlier versions) to SAP Global Trade Services, edition for SAP HANA, the question of implementation approach often pops up. Greenfield vs. Our partners at LINKIT recently published the HANA Study 2019 - THE BREAKTHROUGH IS HERE. When deciding between SAP Greenfield vs Brownfield , there are several factors to consider, including budget, timeline, business goals, and IT infrastructure. Project Development Timeframe. Accenture’s implementation took six months and set the foundation for the SAP S/4HANA upgrade to. Sr. Step-by-Step Guide to Performing a Brownfield SAP ECC to. Each one provides a very different approach toward creating cutting-edge software. 0, I saw some old slides which suggested that by Q3 2019 we should have the conversion option in 2. Such differences can vary according to the site you are. Der Greenfield-Ansatz gestaltet sich in der Regel deutlich aufwendiger und besteht aus komplexen Prozessschritten. The image below outlines the stages of an SAP S/4HANA conversion: 7 steps to prepare and execute your SAP S/4HANA Brownfield Migration. 0 EHP 7 from last 5 years. No compulsion to work within the constraints of existing systems or infrastructure. Bluefin Solutions. There are different ways to SAP S/4HANA: Greenfield, Brownfield or even a selective migration. In that sense, delta sizing is a combination between greenfield and brownfield sizing. According to new government data, there has been a 44% increase on the amount of brownfield sites used, indicating the government is striving to make better use of previously developed. Brownfield: The U. Recorded sessions are available in the SAP Learning. Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield approaches are adopted by companies that want to shift to SAP S/4HANA. There are multiple ways to achieve this, including brownfield, greenfield, and hybrid implementations. Greenfield vs brownfield in the IT world. Learn more and turn your. Choosing a greenfield vs. No compulsion to work within the constraints of existing systems or infrastructure. During that period, you’ll migrate your existing systems, test them and take some time to innovate. Dieser ist disruptiv. Steps by step process for Archiving Object for SD_VBRK. On the other hand, the Brownfield approach is much easier than compared to a Greenfield in that these firms are upgrading from an older version of SAP, such as ECC 5. However, there is no single solution when it comes to SAP S/4HANA migration. Since it's a move to the public cloud, an SAP S/4HANA Cloud implementation differs from on-premises installation in a few ways, such as the levels of customization. 4. Greenfield vs. One option is to use a priority weight for each criteria in order of importance. SAP network great migration content from Vignesh Barani Sivakumar 👨🏻‍💻. Greenfield: A "Greenfield" or "Vanilla" implementation is the traditional way of implementing a SAP system. Greenfield Vs Brownfield: #Sap #S4Hana #Sapstore #Dxaas. Published: 10 Mar 2022. x system, running on any database, to SAP S/4HANA. Some may say that the path of a greenfield installation is much easier; the company is starting from scratch. Over 25 years of experience and expertise as an SAP management consultancy. The SAP greenfield vs. “We make a perfect copy of a customer’s existing system and remove their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to SAP S. The three Ps of Open RAN. Once you have defined the business need and built a business case, you can select the best approach, develop a strategy, create your roadmap and make it happen. Like 0; Share. A hybrid strategy blends features of both Greenfield and Brownfield SAP S/4 HANA processes. This simple framework to help you as starter to decide approach on move to S/4HANA #MoveToCloudNow, #MoveToIntelligentEnterpriseNow #. Our consultancy services are designed to help businesses make informed decisions and successfully implement their chosen approach. brownfield approach for S/4HANA. Although it does have its complexities, it is the simplest approach, and quite possibly the quickest. SAP Enterprise Support Academy has provisioned a conversion model for companies who choose to modernize their IT landscape, while still keeping the original nuts and bolts of their machine in place. A hybrid approach combines elements of greenfield and brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementations for specific reasons. Both approaches can concern many types of IT projects, such as a software tool, an app, a website, a network, or an IT facility. “It’s a little far-fetched, but imagine needing a full engine replacement. Raj: Greenfield basically means that it’s a brand-new implementation of S/4HANA and usually it is done when. SAP customers who are on ECC and looking at moving to S/4HANA will know about and understand at least two. As each methodology has its advantages and challenges. #Brownfield. But. S/4 Brownfield vs Greenfield . By. In the brownfield option, the task may be adding a new management module to the current CMS, integrating new features to an e-store or boosting the performance of an. The approach is. For example, a new BW/4HANA system or SAP BW powered by HANA system where you would be building all data models from scratch and also have the opportunity to rethink and optimize “old” data flows. A greenfield project’s direct contrast is a brownfield project, which involves making improvements or modifications to the current project. RICEFW stands for Reports, Interface, Conversion, Enhancements, Forms, and Workflow. Der Greenfield-Ansatz beinhaltet die Installation und Konfiguration eines brandneuen Netzwerks. It is a comprehensive software solution for companies, also called ERP suite. Dig Deeper on MSP business strategy. An embedded ABAP environment offers values for both greenfield and brownfield projects. Source: SAP. Brownfield vs. This article considers trend # 1 - reduced brownfield investment opportunities. Sites that have not earlier been built on, are called greenfield. Migration to SAP S/4HANA is a quite an investment (primarily because of Cost & Change Management) for any company and is definitely one of the top priorities of the leadership (when to take that leap). Alien vs. Greenfield and brownfield are the two prominent alternatives for transitioning to SAP S/4HANA. At Melasoft, we understand that organizations embarking on an SAP S/4HANA transformation journey need expert guidance and support to navigate the complexities of the Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield approaches. Are you debating greenfield vs brownfield for your S/4 journey? Don’t! There is so much content out there today to help companies decide whether to go. Desde el lanzamiento de SAP S/4 HANA y el deseo de las empresas de actualizarse a esta última versión, comenzó una batalla entre dos enfoques de migración: greenfield vs. The Simplification List provides detailed information at the application level about exactly where the differences between the two suites lie - i. 7. CIO Leadership Live: India. What is greenfield project and brownfield project in SAP? While a Greenfield approach represents a complete reengineering of your SAP ERP, a Brownfield approach is more like an upgrade. Shelbyville. Technical foundation: Move to SAP Business Suite on HANA. greenfield model. A driven and passionate leader focused on speed and quality that has delivered large transformational programs enabling growth and business value. One could either install SAP S/4HANA from scratch, which is often called Greenfield, or convert their current ERP system to SAP S/4HANA, if it fulfilled the requirements as per SAP Note 2290622 – SAP Readiness Check for SAP S/4HANA,. When you need to resolve a brownfield deployment scenario, consider your existing Microsoft Azure environment as the place to start. brownfield debate can be helpful in framing the S/4HANA migration discussion. g. This meticulous approach supports a gradual transformation, letting day-to-day operations glide along with minimal hiccups. At an early stage, SAP Leonardo was synonymous with SAP's Internet of Things services and functions, whereas SAP CLEA was synonymous with machine learning services and functions. Compare SAP greenfield vs. With Selective Data Transition,. Hybrid: make much-needed changes but keep your data. “We make a perfect copy of a customer’s existing system and remove their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to. Greenfield: Building a completely new installation of SAP S/4HANA, essentially starting from scratch and defining a wholly new operating model. With greenfield migration, enterprises can leverage the cloud to easily scale their infrastructure up or down, while with brownfield migration, the legacy systems may need. the migration of data without major process-related, functional and organisational changes?. It is relevant for customers moving from an existing SAP ERP solution to SAP S/4HANA on-premise or SAP S/4HANA cloud, private edition. The Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield, (also known as selective data transition) these are the terms used when somebody wants to implement S/4HANA, and particularly when they’re transforming from SAP ECC footprint. Generally, we differentiate between Greenfield, Brownfield and Expert Sizing. Superman. During a brownfield investment, you will purchase or lease an existing site and redevelop it. 0) must also be carried out in advance of the changeover: SAP Netweaver 7. Main reason behind brownfield remains the preservation of location and lower project costs. Meanwhile, 3% of respondents have plans to move in the next. Such scenarios are also called managed since in this case the underlying framework takes care of all create, update and delete requests and stores them in the. SAP S/4HANA migration: A definitive guide. Greenfield is a new implementation project, while brownfield aims to convert the current ERP system landscape to SAP S/4HANA. This is a very meaningful term for the oil & gas industry. Batman vs. It is a migration strategy that appears promising under certain conditions. The SAP greenfield vs. Der Brownfield-Ansatz steht für ein Software-Upgrade, bei dem alle Daten und. • Reviewed operational processes to support definition of best migration strategy for SAP S/4Hana upgrade of a major retail company; roadmap and key actions defined in 4 months (Greenfield vs. How to decide between a Greenfield and Brownfield S/4HANA transition 11 21 33,232 For transitioning to S/4HANA there are two fundamental options. They should look beyond the standard and well-described Greenfield vs Brownfield playbooks. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give. Then Continue Planning –> select OS/DB dependent files –> and Click on Push to Download Basket. Himanshu Sambhus SAP S/4HANA MM, IM, Central Procurement, Ariba SCC expert, highly experienced in implementation projects on-premise, cloud editions, brownfield conversion & greenfield with multi. James Kofalt, DX4 Research. cut-over from the old system to the new one. brownfield ramifications. Archiving Object. It’s a thorough and simple lift and shift that preserves the structure you already have in place. I will compare the three options and will share main differences and some. It’s got to be at least as. Using Rise with SAP. As an SAP Gold Partner, we use industry best practices for delivering successful S/4 implementation and. Five key things to understand about SAP S/4HANA before implementing it. That simplicity is also its downside, though. Overview of the Deployment Option: The Bluefield Approach for SAP S/4HANA On-Premise or SAP S/4HANA Cloud allows you to combine the elements of. A Brownfield strategy is more like an upgrade than a Greenfield approach, which involves a complete reengineering of your SAP ERP. This introduces a new landscape that coexists with the existing landscape. Raj: Greenfield basically means that it’s a brand-new implementation of S/4HANA and usually it is done when customers want. Some developers prefer greenfield services and others prefer brownfields services. This is a vast improvement to the greenfield model, where OEMs rely on the replacement cycle to sell IoT technology as. Dig into what makes greenfield projects different from brownfield and retrofit projects in supply chain. brownfield migration. SAP Greenfield is the process of implementing SAP S/4HANA without modifying existing systems. What are the pros and cons of greenfield vs brownfield vs selective There are different ways to migrate to SAP S/4HANA. Brownfield und Greenfield sind Ansätze für die Migration der SAP-Landschaft auf SAP S/4HANA. “brownfield” or hybrid way. Often found in rural / countryside areas. What are the pros and cons of greenfield vs brownfield vs selective There are different ways to migrate to SAP S/4HANA. So, the basic meaning is that Greenfield is about “ground-up” projects while Brownfield projects happen when changes to the previously developed structures are made and incorporated. Brownfield can be considered as extending the landscape base on existing technology. Greenfield vs. Management services: Management services are ongoing. Each approach offers distinct. To find out where the differences lie and the advantages and disadvantages of the respective strategies, read here. What are the pros and cons of greenfield vs brownfield vs selective There are different ways to migrate to SAP S/4HANA. Innovative. A success story. Greenfield vs. Looking for a path to SAP S/4HANA? Learn the pros and cons of greenfield, brownfield, hybrid and BLUEFIELD™ from delaware expert Folker Lamote. Message. 1. Advantages of Brownfield Projects: Cost-effectiveness: Upgrading or modifying existing systems can be more cost-effective than building new ones from scratch. 9/5 - this is how our customers rate us on Google on average. This paper describes our experience of developing a new system (Greenfield development) after continuously extending an existing one (Brownfield development) for a long time. Greenfield vs. Looking for a path to SAP S/4HANA? Learn the pros and cons of greenfield, brownfield, hybrid and BLUEFIELD™ from delaware expert Folker Lamote. brownfield data center development, factors such as power, cooling, location and layout can make or break a project. Summary. “Think of a car,” says Folker. By: Jim O'Donnell. SAP Greenfield vs. System Conversion (Brownfield): Software upgrade that preserves all data and settings. Der Greenfield- und der Brownfield-Ansatz stehen also für verschiedene Möglichkeiten, um ein SAP-ERP-System auf S/4HANA umzustellen: Mit dem Greenfield-Ansatz nehmen Unternehmen eine komplette Neuinstallation des SAP S/4HANA-Systems vor. Google Cloud public cloud services and SAP’s own HEC environment. Technically, both migration scenarios are usually technically possible, as well as corresponding middle ways such as Bluefield (selective migration), which are. SAP S/4HANA is an abbreviation and is made up of various parts: "HANA" stands for the SAP HANA database, on which SAP S/4HANA is based. Greenfield land is undeveloped land - agricultural, landscaping, or natural. With #Greenfield investing, a company will build its own, brand new facilities from the ground up. This duration can vary based on factors such as the implementation. It is relevant for customers moving from an existing SAP ERP solution to SAP S/4HANA on-premise or SAP S/4HANA cloud, private edition. History of SAP S/4HANA. If you have an SAP system running that you want to extend with new functionality (delta sizing: brownfield and greenfield approach) and/or add new users (re-sizing) or migrate to SAP HANA perform brownfield sizing. 1. One of the most discussed issues related to SAP S/4HANA migrations is the brownfield vs. As long as the legacy system, e. The renaming to SAP BTP was accompanied by an expansion of the solution - for example, with regard to the integration of non-SAP applications into business processes. However, if you had a lot of technical debt in your system, a greenfield migration would be the more feasible option that would reward you with a clean and. The Greenfield approach lets organizations predefine migration objects and best practices available in the new platform. com Conclusion. Continue Reading. 9/5 - this is how our customers rate us on Google on average. The second one is to pick a greenfield site that is much cleaner than the brownfield one but is located further from the centre. ECC is being used in a single. The terms brownfield and greenfield refer to how old a particular type of infrastructure is. 3 locations (Troisdorf, Berlin and in Switzerland) 2,000 successful projects in more than 70 countries. SAP Greenfield vs. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give you dozens of results with. The conversion is divided into two phases: the preparation. According to our 2022 Pulse of the SAP Customer research, 44% of respondents are currently live on SAP S/4HANA or have started to move. Once you have defined the business need and built a business case, you can select the best approach, develop a strategy, create your roadmap and make it happen. 棕地开发通常发生在您想要开发或改进现有应用程序时,并迫使您使用以前创建的代码。. Greenfield and Brownfield investments are two types of foreign direct investment. RICEFW in SAP is produced during the Explore phase of the SAP Activate methodology – a process designed by SAP to implement SAP products, such as SAP S/4 HANA. CRM and the Customer Service module also play a key role for businesses where post-sales service is important. They chose to use Panaya for both their ECC upgrades as well as for ongoing testing and non-SAP projects, like testing a new program for managing the company’s keg business and a POS system upgrade. They are tailored to a specific industry or line of business (LoB). The Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield, (also known as selective data transition) these are the terms used when somebody wants to implement S/4HANA, and particularly when they’re transforming from SAP ECC footprint. There are different ways to SAP S/4HANA: Greenfield, Brownfield or even a selective migration. SAP S/4HANA was introduced in 2015 and is the successor to SAP ECC 6. 0 and not BW/HANA 2. 200 employees at work. Update to EHP 8. Brownfield approach comparison. In this alternative approach to greenfield or brownfield implementations, a customer can choose to reuse current processes as well as redesign some existing. Converting your existing systems takes about 6 to 12 months. Greenfield vs brownfield in the IT world. Those who rely on Greenfield are looking for more flexibility, a higher degree of innovation, higher data quality and fast, lean. Brownfield project development is more sustainable, as it reduces the pressure on greenfield sites. The Brownfield approach (System conversion) is about moving existing SAP system and business processes to the new S/4HANA platform, enabling the migration without re-implementation and avoiding disruption to existing processes. brownfield approach: Which to use for S/4HANA; How to modernize your. And this is how. brownfield (brownfield deployment, brownfield site): 1. Short-termism? Based on our experience, this is what you need to know: Before New Implementation (Greenfield) vs System Conversion (Brownfield) SAP has long been an undisputed market leader in the ERP space. It supports buyers in all their classic tasks and ensures the digital transformation of the purchasing process. Selective Data Transition (Bluefield): Empty Shell Creation, Conversion and Data Migration. Für SAP-Nutzer mit einer älteren Systemversion ändert sich das nun. Hybrid SAP S/4 Hana Migration Strategy. There are three broad adoption options for your ERP application to move to S/4HANA: 1. The first one is greenfield implementation, where you’ll have to begin from a new slate. Brownfield Data Centers The most importance difference between a Greenfield and Brownfield Data Center is in the approach to building it. A greenfield project can describe any project that a team starts from scratch. Greenfield represents a total shift. If, for example, the changeover is carried out according to the brownfield approach, then the risks are disproportionately higher than with greenfield. Brownfield development is a term commonly used in the information technology industry to describe problem spaces needing the development and deployment of new software systems in the immediate presence of existing (legacy) software applications/systems. Greenfield vs brownfield SAP customers undergoing major disruption and change often take the opportunity to redesign business models and enabling platforms (‘Greenfield’ approach). July 20, 2023. Discover SAP S/4HANA. The closer you are to the brownfield end of the continuum, the easier it is to extract, transform and load historical data as part of the migration. In previous blogs, we discussed what Greenfield and. It is an overachieving set of guidelines used by the project team in making decisions and taking action in alignment with business operational strategies. Greenfield vs. Summary. It is precisely this additional effort that is the advantage. Greenfield vs. SAP S/4HANA. Predator. SAP customers has to make their mind either to go for Green field or Brown filed approach for S4 HANA migration 2) Whether Green field or Brown field has influence whether the customer is going to opt for On-premise or On-cloud environment, because if. Some have chosen the Greenfield approach, which means implementing a. Software development. Blogs (5). On the other hand, the Brownfield approach is much easier than compared to a Greenfield in that these firms are upgrading from an older version of SAP, such as ECC 5. The greenfield approach, on the other hand, usually takes longer. brownfield migration. Predator. C/4HANA can be used "stand alone" or in close combination with S/4HANA. brownfield (brownfield deployment, brownfield site): 1. It allows you to better see and understand your. A greenfield project, or greenfield software development, describes a brand-new project developed from scratch.